With no wide public consultation, the council has introduced new “Invalid Application Charges” for planning applications. Under this policy, if a resident makes a minor technical error on their paperwork (such as a missing scale bar on a drawing), the council freezes the application and levies an administrative penalty—such as a £65 fee for standard householder projects, or up to £240 for larger developments.
What makes this predatory is that it functions as a “double-charge.” Homeowners are already forced to pay significantly increased national planning fees alongside a mandatory £75.83 service fee to the centralized online Planning Portal. Now, Bromley is taking advantage of a legal loophole under Section 93 of the Local Government Act 2003 to slice a second fee directly out of a resident’s planning refund if an application has to be withdrawn and corrected.
Local homeowning residents who want to carry out home improvements will feel that this policy is highly open to abuse.
There is a widespread perception from local homeowners and architects seeking permission to build simply extensions and loft conversions that Bromley Council already uses strict, pedantic tactics to unfairly refuse planning permissions.
This new administration fee introduces a clear financial incentive for the council to aggressively find minor faults and flag applications as “invalid” just to generate internal revenue from ordinary families attempting minor home improvements.
During a cost-of-living crisis, this policy treats honest applicant mistakes as an opportunity for cost-extraction and prices working-class residents out of changing their homes.
As a local resident and practising architect with a long term insight into the increasing regulations and fees imposed on tax paying home owners I am yet again astonished how local government are going to impose further fees without any consultation with their constituents.
I have seen how planning applications have been blankly refused after two months for minor issues that could have been easily addressed with a simple requests. This has led me to the believe that certain councils are intentionally looking to refusw planning application to increase their income. This pattern of finding any way possible to generate income has been implemented with car parking fines, green waste refuse collection and increasing council tax.
This is the economic imperative that dominates all of our institutions now, but when will enough ever be enough? Never! And this will continue to erode our trust, democracy and inventiveness.
I have seen how the Government, both local and central, is increasingly moving away from a consultative and representative entity to a dictatorial and punitive one.
Our institutions, together with our architecture, have become too regulatory and interfering, and are now increasingly impeding the ability for people to live their lives beyond the shackles of capitalism and bureaucracy.
Homeowners and architects
are directly impacted by these escalating costs and will now have to pass the risky business of validating planning applications onto planning consultants, which will further increase the costs of small home improvement projects.
It is exasperating! When will Britain halt the interference of bureaucrat institutions and return to an inventive and inspirational culture? Is this even possible anymore?
We now offer photorealistic animations. Please ask if your other Architect or designer does. Check out one of our recent animations here
Posted on Google Lucas ReeveTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Gary provided us with a great service throughout our process of getting planning position granted for our property. The drawings were clear and professional and we were very happy with the end result. Gary was always very easy to contact and happy to help and provide solutions to any queries we were having.Posted on Google Chris TowillTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I had the pleasure of working with Gary on my Bexley development. He completed the building regulations drawings and construction plan for the project. Building control signed of the document without any questions or queries. This is a testament to Gary's eye for detail. When I did have questions during the build process, Gary was very responsive and was able to provide clarity when amendments needed to be made.Posted on Google Oli OxleyTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. We have recently used Gary Arnold Architects and Gary has been second to none and delivered everything we wanted on time. I would highly recommend Gary if you are looking for an architect.Posted on Google Tammy GracoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I wanted someone to help with an interior renovation and possible extension. Gary was very helpful from the beginning and on a site visit talked through all the options, offering suggestions and pragmatic solutions. Gary developed the final plans very quickly and I have appreciated his recommendations for other companies to use too which has taken some of the stress out of the project and have so far delivered on his recommendations. This has been a much better than previous experience with another architect and I would happily work with Gary again in the future.Posted on Google moema machinTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. We engaged Gary Arnold Architects for the design of our new house, and we couldn't be happier with the experience. Gary clearly explained the planning application process and attentively listened to our wants and concerns. His communication was both effective and professional throughout the project. He delivered an outstanding design that exceeded our expectations, with drawings that creatively illustrated our discussions and optimised the potential for achieve planning permision. We highly recommend Gary to anyone seeking honest and exceptional architectural services.Posted on Google Coral WormanTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I have been speaking to Gary about knocking down an internal wall to open up my galley kitchen. He is patient and knowledgeable and I had lots of questions! Would recommend.Posted on Google Susan SharmanTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. We appointed Gary to draw up some plans for an open plan kitchen area. We both thought Gary was very engaging, very professional and excellent. Approachable and down to earth! He totally got our initial brief, sent initially on email, for our refurbished kitchen/dining area immediately. After an initial site visit, he was attentive and accommodating of our changes along the way and supplied us with many options as we progressed and patiently explained the process to us. We are very happy to have found Gary and would recommend him to provide similar architectural services. He also helped in the search for a builder to talk too!Posted on Google Sarah Li-Ting-WaiTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. We thought Gary was excellent. Got the brief immediately (something that we had been struggling with with another agency), gave numerous options / design choices and patiently explained the process to us. We are very happy to have found Gary and would recommend him to all our friends.Posted on Google KavitaTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. We recently engaged Gary's architectural services and I cannot recommend him highly enough. Gary is very professional, was engaged throughout the process and prompt with his communication. We went back and forth on designs and Gary was really attentive and accommodating of our changes, as well as recommending options to us that we reasonable and took into account our budget. He worked directly with the council so we didn't need to be involved and was able to get our planning application approved. If you are looking for an architect, look no further!Load more